State lawmakers deadlocked during their session in the spring, divided by two potential deals; one with sizable cuts to benefits but a bigger cost savings and another with a choice for state employees and lower projected cost savings.
The main sticking point during the debate on pension reform has been the constitutionality of a change. The state's constitution forbids diminishing pension benefits for employees, but both sides argue about what that means. Any final deal will likely be challenged in court which will later lead to the State Supreme Court.
The court could also weigh in on a dispute between lawmakers and the governor stemming from when the governor eliminated lawmakers' pay with a veto. During Garman's term, the court could also weigh in on same-sex marriage, eavesdropping laws, juvenile justice and even red light cameras.
Copyright 2015 Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.